| From: | Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inappropriate failure conditions in foreign_data regression test |
| Date: | 2009-10-05 13:25:24 |
| Message-ID: | 4AC9F3C4.4060400@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> By chance I noticed that the foreign_data regression test fails if run
> in an installation where "bob" is a live user. It appears to be
> assuming that half a dozen other fairly common names don't belong to
> real users, either. Could we make this a little less fragile? Maybe
Attached is a patch that attempts to fix that -- user mappings are now
created for "regress_test_missing_role" instead of "bob" or "baz".
> call them no_such_user_N. Or for that matter do we really need quite
> so many tests of the same error condition?
>
The code paths leading to those error conditions are different (or at
least they should be). The initial aim was to get as much test coverage
as possible, but I guess the tests could be simplified if this is turning
out to be a maintenance burden
regards,
Martin
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| foreign_data_regression.patch | text/x-diff | 5.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-10-05 13:31:35 | Re: commented out para in docs |
| Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2009-10-05 13:23:28 | Re: Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG" |