From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1 |
Date: | 2009-09-26 00:10:58 |
Message-ID: | 4ABD5C12.2080209@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>
>> What I find amazing is that it passed the test where I put it doing make
>> installcheck in an infinite loop for a long time. I guess that means the
>> regression tests hardly touch the concurrency code at all, which now I
>> think about it makes sense but I still find that very worrying. :-(
>>
>
> Try installcheck-parallel, which should be a bit better. It's probably
> not yet good enough though because it always runs the same tests
> concurrently.
>
>
It is also quite easy to set up your own schedule.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-26 00:23:12 | Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1 |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-26 00:05:25 | Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings |