Re: generic copy options

From: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel(dot)Cecchet(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generic copy options
Date: 2009-09-18 17:54:23
Message-ID: 4AB3C94F.7060703@asterdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Nope, but it was on the checklist and I was being thorough.
>>
>
> That's a good thing. I was just seeing if I needed to get involved in
> performance testing.
>
That would be good to have more people test the autopartitioning feature
in COPY. If you want to be involved in performance testing on that, that
would be great.

Emmanuel

--
Emmanuel Cecchet
Aster Data Systems
Web: http://www.asterdata.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2009-09-18 17:55:13 Re: updated hstore patch
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-09-18 17:48:02 Re: updated join removal patch