Re: Feedback about Drupal SQL debugging

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Jean-Michel Pouré <jm(at)poure(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feedback about Drupal SQL debugging
Date: 2009-08-21 23:01:36
Message-ID: 4A8F2750.1010504@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jean-Michel Pouré wrote:
>
>> BTW, why don't we have a multi-argument version of CONCAT()? In 8.4,
>> it
>> would be possible ... I should add it to mysqlcompat library.
>>
>
> yes. In PostgreSQL core ...
>

No. That is exactly where it shouldn't go. And frankly, Drupal
developers should stop writing non-portable code. Isn't there a Mysql
mode that is supposed to conform to the standard, at least more than
their default mode?

> PostgreSQL requires all non-aggregated fields to be present in the GROUP
> BY clause (I fixed 10 such issues in Drupal code).
> http://drupal.org/node/555530
>
> Why can't PostgreSQL add the required field automatically? Could this be
> added to PostgreSQL to-do-list?
>
>
>

Isn't that contrary to the standard?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-08-21 23:03:40 Re: Feedback about Drupal SQL debugging
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2009-08-21 22:51:00 Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema