Re: 8.4, One-Time Filter and subquery ( ... FROM function() union all ... )

From: Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>
To: Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.4, One-Time Filter and subquery ( ... FROM function() union all ... )
Date: 2009-07-07 22:13:41
Message-ID: 4A53C895.5060008@mark.mielke.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I found Tom's response ambiguous - but positive in either way, so it
gave me a smile. :-)

Which of the following two great things occurred?
1) Tom popped a quick fix on CVS HEAD? (Pretty fast!)
2) Tom or somebody else had already done it?

Cheers,
mark

On 07/07/2009 05:14 PM, Sergey Burladyan wrote:
> Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes
>> As of CVS HEAD you get
>>
>> QUERY PLAN
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.011..0.011 rows=0 loops=1)
>> One-Time Filter: false
>> Total runtime: 0.179 ms
>> (3 rows)
>>
>
> Thank you, Tom !
>
>

--
Mark Mielke<mark(at)mielke(dot)cc>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-07-07 22:15:13 Re: *_collapse_limit, geqo_threshold
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-07-07 22:10:12 Re: *_collapse_limit, geqo_threshold