From: | Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
Date: | 2009-06-17 14:59:24 |
Message-ID: | 4A3904CC.1020105@pjmodos.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane erote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Why don't we tell people to write a plpgsql loop for the schema.* case as
>> well?
>>
>
> Indeed, why not? This all seems much more like gilding the lily than
> delivering useful new capability. The default-ACL stuff that Stephen
> is working on seems far more important in practice.
>
I agree that Default ACLs are more important and I already offered
Stephen help on that. But I've seen countless requests for granting on
all tables to a user and I already got some positive feedback outside of
the list, so I believe there is demand for this. Also to paraphrase you
Tom, by that logic you can tell people to write half of administration
functionality as plpgsql functions.
--
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-06-17 15:06:02 | Re: machine-readable explain output |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-06-17 14:48:15 | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |