Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> If there is a relationship between the items then that needs to be expressed
>> in the XML structure, either by use of child nodes or attributes. Relying on
>> the sequence of nodes, if that's what you're doing, is not a good idea, and
>>
>
> I'm not doing that. Period, full stop. The discussion was only about
> attributes vs. child nodes.
>
>
>
OK, I misread something you wrote, which prompted me to say that.
Rereading it I realise my error. My apologies.
cheers
andrew