| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: machine-readable explain output |
| Date: | 2009-06-14 12:57:52 |
| Message-ID: | 4A34F3D0.8080703@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>> I thing so using --with-libxml is good idea. Is nonsense repeat some
>> necessary xml code like xml escaping and similar. And almost all
>> distributed PostgreSQL binaries are compiled with xml support, so this
>> cannot do some problems. When somebody compile pg without xml support,
>> then he knows what he do.
>>
>
> That will mean we never get to use XML explain in pgAdmin. We're not
> in the business of writing basic features that might work, if the
> postgres packager enabled an option. We need to be able to rely on
> such features always being available.
>
>
As a matter of curiosity, do we have any idea what platforms don't
support libxml2?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-14 14:52:49 | Re: machine-readable explain output |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-06-14 12:08:52 | Re: machine-readable explain output |