Re: Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset
Date: 2009-06-10 11:40:30
Message-ID: 4A2F9BAE.2050208@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 06/10/2009 01:38 PM, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Andres Freund<andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>
>> Plan time (averaged) without change:
>> cnt: 40 (4 times per session)
>> avg: 4572ms
>>
>> Plan time (averaged) with change:
>> cnt: 40 (4 times per session)
>> avg: 4236ms
>>
>> ~7% difference. Same with higher number of repetitions and with most other
>> planner settings I tried
>
> What are you comparing here?
32bit and 64bit bitmapsets with the attached query. 32beeing the default
and the slower one.

Does that answer the question?

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Kerr 2009-06-10 12:50:25 Re: [PATCH 2/2] [libpq] Try to avoid manually masking SIGPIPEs on every send()
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2009-06-10 11:38:34 Re: Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset