Re: Vacuuming technique doubt

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "S Arvind" <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuuming technique doubt
Date: 2009-06-02 00:35:24
Message-ID: 4A242D7C.EE98.0025.1@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

S Arvind <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> The reason why we need it manually is , we don't need any
> performance drop in our production hours. So we figured out the most
> less usage working time, most freq used tables and want to perform
> that on daily . so in weekends we can vaccum and reindex entire db..

By the time you get to your mass reindex the bloat will be harming
your performance much more than the autovacuum needs to do. Check the
documentation here:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/runtime-config-resource.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-RESOURCE-VACUUM-COST

I hope this helps.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-06-02 00:41:04 Re: Vacuuming technique doubt
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-06-01 22:58:40 Re: Unexpected query plan results