Re: RFD: Discarded tuple count for SeqScan nodes in EXPLAIN ANALYZE

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Raney <raneyt(at)cecs(dot)pdx(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFD: Discarded tuple count for SeqScan nodes in EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Date: 2009-05-23 00:37:14
Message-ID: 4A17453A.2000807@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 05/22/2009 05:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> This sort of ties into the discussions we have periodically about
> allowing EXPLAIN to output XML or some other more-machine-friendly
> data format. The barrier for adding additional output fields would
> be a lot lower in such a format.
So the best thing would be to work on that front...

Tom (Raney), did you further work on your XML explain patch? Could you
use help?

Greetings,

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Honda Shigehiro 2009-05-23 04:13:51 Re: patch for ja.po
Previous Message Gevik Babakhani 2009-05-22 22:37:42 question about pg_proc