Re: New trigger option of pg_standby

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Date: 2009-04-21 19:27:59
Message-ID: 49EE1E3F.9050307@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'd like to propose another simple idea; pg_standby deletes the
>> trigger file *whenever* the nextWALfile is a timeline history file.
>> A timeline history file is restored at the end of recovery, so it's
>> guaranteed that the trigger file is deleted whether nextWALfile
>> exists or not.
>>
>> A timeline history file is restored also at the beginning of
>> recovery, so the accidentally remaining trigger file is deleted
>> in early warm-standby as a side-effect of this idea.
>
> Here is the revised patch as above.
>
> If you notice something, please feel free to comment.

Ok, looking at this in more detail now. A couple of small things:

We mustn't remove the trigger file immediately even in fast mode. As
noted elsewhere in this thread, we have the same bug in fast mode where
pg_standby gets stuck if you copy WAL files directly into pg_xlog.

pg_standby should exit with code 0 only if the file is restore
successfully. As the patch stands it also returns 0 when smart failover
is done.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikko 2009-04-21 20:32:18 Re: trouble with to_char('L')
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2009-04-21 19:07:34 Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax