Re: Unicode string literals versus the world

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: kleptog(at)svana(dot)org, markokr(at)gmail(dot)com, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Date: 2009-04-16 12:19:09
Message-ID: 49E7223D.9010205@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>> I could live with either. Wikipedia says: "The characters outside the
>>> first plane usually have very specialized or rare use." For years we
>>> rejected all characters beyond the first plane, and while that's fixed
>>> now, the volume of complaints wasn't huge.
>>>
>> I you mean "first plane" as BMP (i.e. 16bit range), above is not true
>> for PostgreSQL 7.3 or later at least.
>>
>
> Oops. I meant 8.2 or later.
>
>

Umm, that's what I said. We used to do it like that, but we don't any more.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Robinson 2009-04-16 14:19:21 Re: NOTIFY / LISTEN silently parses and discards schema-ish portion of notification name ...
Previous Message Kevin Field 2009-04-16 12:09:06 Re: Postgres SQL specification (tests)