Re: Unicode string literals versus the world

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Date: 2009-04-11 19:09:57
Message-ID: 49E0EB05.9080203@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Peter put it in, I think. It is in the SQL:2008 spec, but that doesn't
> change the fact that it's a horribly bad piece of design.

Hmmm. We're not going to implement *everything* in the spec; nobody
does, even IBM. I think maybe these kinds of additions need to be
hashed out for value so we don't waste Peter's work in the future. Peter?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-11 19:12:39 Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-11 19:07:58 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world