| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
| Date: | 2009-04-11 19:07:51 |
| Message-ID: | 49E0EA87.2060903@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
It fits into 80 columns if you don't have any functions with 11
parameters. ;-)
Actually, I'm thinking the new column ought to be called "type". That
way, it could be "window" or "trigger" or "internal", and more types
later if we develop any (like "MED").
> Too late for 8.4 I'm afraid, but we could talk about it for 8.5. What
> have you got in mind that would be different from \df?
Well, \df+. It would have the same columns. But you'd be able to query
just the column you want, and just the types you want.
SELECT name, parameters FROM pg_functions WHERE function_type = "window".
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-11 19:07:58 | Re: Unicode string literals versus the world |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-11 19:02:58 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |