Re: Documentation Update: WAL & Checkpoints

From: Michael Renner <michael(dot)renner(at)amd(dot)co(dot)at>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation Update: WAL & Checkpoints
Date: 2009-04-10 14:59:51
Message-ID: 49DF5EE7.4060509@amd.co.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Michael Renner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is a small update to the first paragraph of the WAL configuration
>> chapter, going into more detail WRT redo vs. checkpoint records, since
>> the underlying behavior is currently only deducible from the source. I'm
>> not perfectly sure if I got everything right, so feel free to change as
>> necessary.

[..]

> I read over you patch and I was afraid it was trying to put too much
> information into a single paragraph, so I added a second paragraph that
> just talks about checkpoint smoothing. I did not address the issue of
> when the REDO WAL entry is written --- that is probably too much detail
> for our documentation.

Too bad, understanding how this works is necessary to properly implement
more complex log shipping setups. Maybe /backend/access/transam/README
instead? Or specific "under the hood" paragraphs for selected areas of
the DBMS?

best regards,
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message l0rins 2009-04-10 15:01:04 unable to install tsearch2 on PostgreSQL 8.3.7 successfully
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-10 14:15:58 Re: pg_restore dependencies