From: | Michael Renner <michael(dot)renner(at)amd(dot)co(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Documentation Update: WAL & Checkpoints |
Date: | 2009-04-10 14:59:51 |
Message-ID: | 49DF5EE7.4060509@amd.co.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Michael Renner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is a small update to the first paragraph of the WAL configuration
>> chapter, going into more detail WRT redo vs. checkpoint records, since
>> the underlying behavior is currently only deducible from the source. I'm
>> not perfectly sure if I got everything right, so feel free to change as
>> necessary.
[..]
> I read over you patch and I was afraid it was trying to put too much
> information into a single paragraph, so I added a second paragraph that
> just talks about checkpoint smoothing. I did not address the issue of
> when the REDO WAL entry is written --- that is probably too much detail
> for our documentation.
Too bad, understanding how this works is necessary to properly implement
more complex log shipping setups. Maybe /backend/access/transam/README
instead? Or specific "under the hood" paragraphs for selected areas of
the DBMS?
best regards,
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | l0rins | 2009-04-10 15:01:04 | unable to install tsearch2 on PostgreSQL 8.3.7 successfully |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-10 14:15:58 | Re: pg_restore dependencies |