| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: One less footgun: removing pg_dump -d |
| Date: | 2009-03-09 20:04:37 |
| Message-ID: | 49B57655.1020901@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>>> -i, --ignore-version proceed even when server version mismatches
>>> pg_dump version
>> Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely.
>> Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts".
>
> I thought about something like that, but that would break even more existing
> scripts than the current patch, no? I'd be all for not using -I though, as that
> would not break anything.
>
> Sorry about the "deprecation" name, I withdraw that part
>
> Magnus: Sorry about non-mergeability, I wrote this while offline...
No, the problem is not that I get merge failures. It's that *your* merge
conflicts are included in the patch itself.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-09 20:04:59 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704) |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2009-03-09 20:02:54 | Re: One less footgun: removing pg_dump -d |