Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS
Date: 2009-02-08 16:26:06
Message-ID: 498F079E.2040400@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> The attached patch (which lacks doc changes or regression
> tests as yet) does that, and also adds the inverse SET WITH OIDS
> operation to do what you'd expect, ie, add an OID column if it isn't
> there already.
>
>

Why would we add an operation to implement a deprecated feature? That
seems very strange.

(I have no problem with making SET WITHOUT OIDS rewrite the table.)

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-02-08 16:51:22 Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-02-08 16:13:47 WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS