Re: 8.4 release planning

From: Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning
Date: 2009-01-27 19:39:23
Message-ID: 497F62EB.10500@manicmethod.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> This seems to me to be exactly parallel to deciding that SELinux should
>> control only table/column permissions within SQL; an approach that would
>> be enormously less controversial, less expensive, and more reliable than
>> what SEPostgres tries to do.
>
> While also ignoring a feature that is available, and used by these same
> security communities, in other enterprise RDBMSs...
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1743
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/multisec.mspx
>
> It's not codified in the SQL spec (yet..) that I saw, and maybe we could
> seperate out the SE bits from the row-level bits, but I'm really not
> sure I see the value in doing that..

They are separate. If you look at the patches you'll see a pgace part, this is
where the core interfaces to the security backends, and you'll see a rowacl
backend and an sepgsql backend.

Personally I'd like to see all of the access control moved out to use pgace,
including the standard DAC permissions but I doubt that would never happen.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-01-27 19:39:34 Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)
Previous Message Joshua Brindle 2009-01-27 19:37:07 Re: 8.4 release planning