Re: Controlling hot standby

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Controlling hot standby
Date: 2009-01-23 15:07:58
Message-ID: 4979DD4E.7080407@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Is 'hot standby' going to be the official moniker for the feature?
> (not 'standby replication', or something else?). I wonder if we
> should pick something more descriptive.

Could also be something like "allow_connections_during_recovery".

I'd keep the word "replication" out of this..

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Chernow 2009-01-23 15:12:38 Re: AIX 4.3 getaddrinfo busted
Previous Message Sam Mason 2009-01-23 15:06:55 Re: deductive databases in postgreSQL