Re: SSI 2PC coverage

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSI 2PC coverage
Date: 2011-08-18 14:07:41
Message-ID: 4951.1313676461@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 07.07.2011 18:43, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> OK. I'll work on this tonight unless Dan jumps in to claim it.

> Committed. I removed the second expected output file, and marked the
> prepared-transactions tests in the schedule as "ignore" instead. That
> way if max_prepared_transactions=0, you get a notice that the test case
> failed, but pg_regress still returns 0 as exit status.

Why did you only commit on 9.1 branch?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-08-18 14:12:43 Re: SSI 2PC coverage
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-08-18 14:07:02 Re: vacuum rusage fix