| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | parallel restore vs. windows |
| Date: | 2008-12-09 02:08:39 |
| Message-ID: | 493DD327.6000102@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
OK, after quite some trying I have hit a brick wall. I have been unable
to get parallel restore to work with Windows threading. No doubt I am
missing something, but I really don't know what. Unless someone can tell
me what I am doing wrong, I have these possibilities:
* run parallel steps on Windows in separate processes rather than
threads, similar to what we do in the server, or
* disable parallel restore on Windows for now.
Time is unfortunately running very short.
Latest attempt is attached.
cheers
andrew
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| parallel_restore_11.patch.gz | application/x-gzip | 15.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Chernow | 2008-12-09 02:19:45 | Re: parallel restore vs. windows |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2008-12-09 01:29:08 | Re: V2 of PITR performance improvement for 8.4 |