| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard |
| Date: | 2008-12-05 00:44:58 |
| Message-ID: | 4938798A.2030308@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Ron Mayer wrote:
>
>> OTOH there tends to be less DBA time available to tune the smaller
>> demo instances that come&go as sales people upgrade their laptops; so
>> improved automation would be much appreciated there.
>
> I have a TODO list for things that might be interesting to add to a V2.0
> version of this tool. I just added an item to there for extending the
> tuning model usefully into working on systems with smaller amounts of
> RAM. I'm not opposed to the idea, just don't have any background doing
> that and I'm trying to stay focused on the more common big-machine
> problems for the first release.
We *have* a configuration for small amounts of RAM; it's our current
default configuration.
However, I take the point that the "workstation" calculations should
work down to 128MB of system RAM. I'll check.
--Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2008-12-05 01:39:48 | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard |
| Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2008-12-05 00:32:30 | Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1202 |