Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches

From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches
Date: 2008-10-07 23:09:20
Message-ID: 48EBEC20.2010907@kaigai.gr.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> > 2) Do we want row-level permissions at the SQL level?
>>>
>>> Now I'm working for it and will submit patches due to the end of Oct,
>>> if it is really required to make progress reviewing of SE-PostgreSQL
>>> on the v8.4 development cycle.
>>> However, the scale of its demand is unclear for me.
>>
>> Yes, which is why I would like the community to answer the question
>> before you have to start coding things. I will say that if we do want
>> it, the SE-Linux code will be 96% in separate modules and will make it
>> much easier to accept.
>
> OK, I'll stop my hand today, and wait for pgsql-hacker's opinions.

I want to confirm the conclusion of this issue.

If I can understand correctly, we don't have a clear conclusion of this.
So, it is unclear for me whether the row-level permission at SQL level is
necessary to progress the reviewing process of SE-PostgreSQL, or not.

Please give me any suggestion.

Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-10-07 23:23:12 Better error message for a small problem with WITH RECURSIVE
Previous Message Robert Haas 2008-10-07 22:42:02 Re: query path, and rules