Re: proposal: UTF8 to_ascii function

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jan Urbański <j(dot)urbanski(at)students(dot)mimuw(dot)edu(dot)pl>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: UTF8 to_ascii function
Date: 2008-08-11 15:19:13
Message-ID: 48A05871.4030007@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2008/8/11 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
>
>> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>>>> But what would be the meaning of this?:
>>>>
>>>> to_ascii(bytea, integer)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> it's symmetric. Nothing more.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Symmetric to what? What is the second argument supposed to be?
>>
>>
>
> postgres=# \df to_ascii
> List of functions
> Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types
> ------------+----------+------------------+---------------------
> pg_catalog | to_ascii | text | text
> pg_catalog | to_ascii | text | text, integer
> pg_catalog | to_ascii | text | text, name
>
> postgres=# select to_ascii('pavel',8);
> to_ascii
> ----------
> pavel
> (1 row)
>
>
>
>

Hmm. That's not documented, and I suspect shouldn't be there. Everywhere
else pretty much that I can think of we pass the encoding as a name, and
I think we should be consistent about it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Decibel! 2008-08-11 15:19:21 Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2008-08-11 15:04:45 Re: proposal: UTF8 to_ascii function