| From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
| Date: | 2008-04-09 15:37:36 |
| Message-ID: | 47FCE2C0.3040509@esilo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> The key phrase in that being "some way or another". Red Hat works with
> a concept of core vs extras (or another way to look at it being what
> comes on the CDs vs what you have to download from someplace). I think
> it's highly likely that libpgtypes would end up in extras. If you do
> not make it possible to package it that way (ie, separately from libpq),
> it's more likely that it won't get packaged at all than that it will be
> put in core.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
I'll buy this. Better to be safe then sorry. This patch becomes more
flexible and distributable when separated.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-09 15:39:51 | Re: Concurrent psql API |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-04-09 15:33:43 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-09 15:39:51 | Re: Concurrent psql API |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-04-09 15:33:43 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |