Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a

From: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a
Date: 2008-04-09 14:50:44
Message-ID: 47FCD7C4.1060805@esilo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I think Andrew Chernow is fundamentally confused about dynamic linking,
> which apache has to use because it doesn't know what type of file it has
> to handle, with linking, which is bound to the application code.
> pgtypes is bound to the application code so it is not like apache --- an
> application isn't going to be fed arbitrary pgtypes function calls it
> has to handle.
>

This discussion is now completely pointless as we have conceeded to a
separate library. The community has spoken. We are trying to move on
and open a discussion on the hook design.

there are numbered questions:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00565.php

--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Chernow 2008-04-09 14:54:15 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-09 14:43:58 Re: Commit fest queue

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Chernow 2008-04-09 14:54:15 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-09 14:39:17 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a