| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: modules |
| Date: | 2008-04-05 01:53:56 |
| Message-ID: | 47F6DBB4.4020906@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, the current state really does seem to mean that the
> "feature of modularity" really is the kiss of death, since things are
> actively pushed out from core to be modular projects, making them
> unusable for most people...
>
Really? What have we pushed out that has died? The only thing I can
recall of any significance being pushed out is the client libraries, and
most or all of those are still alive and kicking.
>
>> Like Andrew, I'm a bit disturbed that people feel free to propose to
>> implement this stuff when they evidently have read none of the prior
>> discussions.
>>
>
> Well, I'm happy to go back to lurking for now... Maybe after a few
> years I'll have heard and seen more discussions and know better next
> time ;-)
>
>
Don't take it personally.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | windwxc | 2008-04-05 02:41:21 | dump data into complex type table |
| Previous Message | Terry Lee Tucker | 2008-04-05 01:20:23 | Re: Conversion to 8.3 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-05 02:19:47 | Re: Patch queue -> wiki |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-05 01:49:26 | Re: Patch queue -> wiki |