Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Date: 2008-02-20 01:37:51
Message-ID: 47BB846F.3030205@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Still and all, I will hold still for having it be installed by default
> as long as there is a simple way for the DBA to change that default
> --- let's say, roughly as simple as it is now for the DBA to make it the
> default if he wishes (ie "create language plpgsql" in template1) and
> revoke that again if he changes his mind ("drop language plpgsql" in
> template1). initdb-time switches are not an adequate answer, not least
> because most packagers don't make it easy to control them.
>
>
>

The way I intended to do it would indeed allow it to be undone simply by
executing 'drop language plpgsql' in template1.

I'm not clear about what else you want.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2008-02-20 01:52:56 gateway test II
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-02-20 01:36:45 Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison