| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Date: | 2008-02-06 16:48:15 |
| Message-ID: | 47A9E4CF.7060508@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 4:24 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>>
>> I would rather set a target and modify it if necessary based on
>> experience than have none at all.
>>
>> The danger of not doing so is that we'll be in almost constant 'commit
>> fest' mode.
>>
>
> Yes, that is something we discussed, and the reason why we used the
> wording 'proposed timetable for the cycle'. We will adjust the timing
> if need be, but wanted to start out on a confident note :-)
>
>
>
Sometimes I wish we could decide if we want to be wishy or washy ;-)
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-02-06 16:57:25 | Re: Page-at-a-time Locking Considerations |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-02-06 16:36:14 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |