Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3
Date: 2007-11-16 17:44:52
Message-ID: 473DD714.2080609@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> - --On Friday, November 16, 2007 11:10:09 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm really not
>> too sure what the functional incompatibilities between versions are,
>> but given the extent of line-by-line diffs I've seen in the output of
>> even adjacent versions, this isn't a question I want to take lightly.
>
> Just curious, but isn't that something the buildfarm would be good for?
> generate/commit a 6.1 version of configure, and see if any of hte buildfarm
> environments break ... or am I missing something 'post-install' that could be
> affected?

Maybe the BF members could just run their default autoconf as part of
the build if they have one.

/D

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-11-16 17:52:49 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-11-16 17:39:50 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-11-16 17:52:49 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-11-16 17:39:50 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3