| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alex Drobychev <adrobj(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: How to keep a table in memory? |
| Date: | 2007-11-13 02:40:13 |
| Message-ID: | 47390E8D.2030701@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Monday 12 November 2007 18:31, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> 1. when someone replies to your post at the bottom, please don't put
>> your reply at the top. It makes everything totally unreadable.
>>
>
> +1
>
>> 2. you should investigate one or more of: pg_memcache, solid state disk.
>>
>
> you might also consider creating a tablespace on tmpfs or ramfs or something
> like pramfs
>
>> FYI, Postgres is know to be used successfully on some *extremely* heavy
>> websites, without using tables pinned in memory.
>>
>
> +1
I give this a +/- 1. Yes extremely heavy websites can do this *but* they
require extremely expensive hardware to do so.
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-13 02:40:16 | Re: pgsql: Adjust script to be consistent (thanks Tom for the fix). |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2007-11-13 02:15:01 | Re: How to keep a table in memory? |