Re: (Never?) Kill Postmaster?

From: Christian Schröder <cs(at)deriva(dot)de>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: (Never?) Kill Postmaster?
Date: 2007-11-09 08:41:43
Message-ID: 47341D47.1070205@deriva.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Christian_Schr=F6der?= <cs(at)deriva(dot)de> writes:
>
>> I don't want to "kill -9" the processes because the last time
>> I did this the database was in recovery mode for a substantial amount of
>> time.
>>
>
> A useful tip on that: if you perform a manual CHECKPOINT just before
> issuing the kills, recovery time should be minimal.
>
Thanks for the tip. For the moment, I will leave the processes in their
current state to be able to perform further tests in case you need more
data. But when I will start feeling uncomfortable with the situation I
will follow your advice.

Regards,
Christian

--
Deriva GmbH Tel.: +49 551 489500-42
Financial IT and Consulting Fax: +49 551 489500-91
Hans-Böckler-Straße 2 http://www.deriva.de
D-37079 Göttingen

Deriva CA Certificate: http://www.deriva.de/deriva-ca.cer

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2007-11-09 09:28:39 Re: "Resurrected" data files - problem?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-11-09 08:32:49 Re: "Resurrected" data files - problem?