Re: Visibility map thoughts

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Visibility map thoughts
Date: 2007-11-07 21:42:53
Message-ID: 4731DCFC.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2007 at 3:13 PM, in message
<47322A7E(dot)8060000(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2007 at 8:18 AM, in message <473077AD(dot)30101(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> The indexam API needs to be modified as well, because there's currently
>>> no API to return index tuples from an index.
>>
>> I know this is tangential, but expanding the types of selection
>> criteria which can be applied to index entries (beyond equality and
>> range tests) might fall out of this, yes?
>
> What else so you have in mind?
>
> With index-only-scans, it would sometimes make sense to do a full index
> scan. I wasn't thinking of anything else on that front myself.

I know this issue on this thread has come up at least one or two
other times lately:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-08/msg00113.php

I know it's a largely independent issue, but your comment about the
API not giving access to the index tuples echoed comments regarding
what it would take to allow optimizations in this area.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2007-11-07 21:53:04 New tzdata available
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-11-07 21:13:34 Re: Visibility map thoughts