Re: Clarification about HOT

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clarification about HOT
Date: 2007-11-02 16:21:38
Message-ID: 472B4E92.1060807@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gokulakannan Somasundaram wrote:
> I understand that if you have to Vacuum a tuple, it has to satisfy the
> necessary snapshot requirements. i will never be able to reduce the chain to
> just one, because the there is always a indirection at the top of HOT. I
> understood this.
>
> My question was is it the only reason for the decision to stop HOT across
> pages.

Another reason is that it avoids the whole problem of updating multiple
pages atomically, without deadlocks.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2007-11-02 16:22:50 Re: Proposal: Select ... AS OF Savepoint
Previous Message David Fetter 2007-11-02 16:17:04 Re: minimal update