| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Date: | 2007-10-09 20:35:03 |
| Message-ID: | 470BE5F7.7020302@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>>
>> Can somebody please explain to me what beta means if you can commit new
>> stuff after it has been declared?
>>
>
> We allow /contrib to be more lax about beta changes.
>
>
I think we should be looking long and hard at that. I can't see any
justification for it at all.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-10-09 20:36:28 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-09 20:22:26 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-10-09 20:36:28 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-10-09 20:32:42 | Locale + encoding combinations |