"Craig A. James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com> writes:
> Bill Moran wrote:
>> I have no idea if that's legally binding or not, but I've talked to a few
>> associates who have some experience in law, and they all argue that email
>> disclaimers probably aren't legally binding anyway -- so the result is
>> undefined.
> No, it's not legally binding. Agreements are only binding if both
> parties agree, and someone sending you email has not consented to your
> statement.
To take this back to the PG problem: it's probably true that we can
ignore disclaimers as far as receiving, redistributing, and archiving
mail list submissions goes. On the other hand, accepting a patch is
another matter.
regards, tom lane