Re: Are we done with sync-commit-defaults-to-off patch?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are we done with sync-commit-defaults-to-off patch?
Date: 2007-09-09 17:03:40
Message-ID: 46E4276C.2060104@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> We've had that hack in there for almost a month now, and no strange
> behaviors have turned up in the buildfarm. So I'm inclined to think
> it has served its purpose, and we should revert it before anyone else
> comes to bogus conclusions about performance. This is particularly
> the case since Andrew has worked up a pg_regress enhancement that would
> let specific buildfarm animals still test the "off" setting if they
> chose.
>
>
>

+1

I will commit the pg_regress change. There are several buildfarm client
changes in the queue - I will add a facility to take advantage of this
and get out a new release of the client.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-09-09 17:18:23 Re: invalidly encoded strings
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-09-09 16:59:21 Re: pgcrypto related backend crash on solaris 10/x86_64