Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-09-02 21:48:08
Message-ID: 46DB2F98.6060908@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Dave Page wrote:
> If that was the aim we would have branded it as "EnterpriseDB
> PostgreSQL" from the outset.

Or "EnterpriSQL", along with flaming customers who say "Enterpri".

IMHO the only reason we tolerate PostgreSQL is we're so numb to it.

To our execs, customers, and competitors "PostgreSQL" is just
as absurd as "EnterpriSQL".

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-09-02 22:54:54 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Dave Page 2007-09-02 20:24:15 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)