Re: FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (Win32)

From: Terry Yapt <yapt(at)technovell(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Trevor Talbot <quension(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Shelby Cain <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (Win32)
Date: 2007-08-24 19:19:06
Message-ID: 46CF2F2A.3020106@technovell.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane escribió:
> I'm not sure if you have a specific technical meaning of "clone" in mind
> here, but these processes are all executing the identical executable,
> and taking care to map the shmem early in execution *before* they load
> any DLLs. So it should work. Apparently, it *does* work for awhile for
> the OP, and then stops working, which is even odder.
>
>
Yes, the windows system log (application log section) doesn't show any
error in several days. Suddenly errors bring back to life and syslog
errors repeats every few time. But again errors disappears and return
in a few hours. After few hours the system goes out.

Curiosity:
======
On the log lines I have and I sent to the list: * FATAL: could not
reattach to shared memory (key=5432001, addr=01D80000): Invalid argument
, this one: "addr=01D80000" is always the same in spite of the system
have been shutting down and restarted or the error was out for a days.

Greetings.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Thoen 2007-08-24 19:43:11 Re: PG Seg Faults Performing a Query
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-24 18:34:02 Re: Out of Memory - 8.2.4