Re: SQL feature requests

From: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: Ben Tilly <btilly(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL feature requests
Date: 2007-08-23 18:03:51
Message-ID: 46CDCC07.7060402@phlo.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ben Tilly wrote:
> On 8/22/07, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Aug 22, 2007, at 20:49 , Ben Tilly wrote:
>>
>>> If your implementation accepts:
>>>
>>> group by case when true then 'foo' end
>> What would that mean? Regardless of whether or not it's accepted, it
>> should have *some* meaning.
>
> To my eyes it has a very clear meaning, we're grouping on an
> expression that happens to be a constant. Which happens to be the
> same for all rows. Which is a spectacularly useless thing to actually
> do, but the ability to do it happens to be convenient when I'm looking
> for something to terminate a series of commas in a dynamically built
> query.

Which is the same very clear meaning that "group by 1" has - we're
grouping on a expression which happens to be the constant 1. Hey,
wait a second. This isn't what "group by 1" means at all - it
rather means group by whatever the fist column in the select list is.

So, yes, "group by 'foo'" *seems* to have a very clear meaning - but
that clearness vanishes as soon as you take into account what "group by 1"
means.

greetings, Florian Pflug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chuck McDevitt 2007-08-23 18:06:16 Re: SQL feature requests
Previous Message Ben Tilly 2007-08-23 17:57:55 Re: SQL feature requests