Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Dave Page wrote:

>> The hard way, is exactly why we have neglected our partners (sponsors)
>> to date, because of time, and resources. It is also the exact same
>> reason that Berkus has *also* not provided a new sponsors page.
>
> Ok. I have to admit I don't follow you - what exactly is your need? To
> be able to dynamically handle *public* information about sponsors, or to
> be bale to handle *confidential* information about them?

Let's take this to another thread. After arguing with dpage about this I
realize we might be talking past each other.

>
> If you're talking about the public stuff, then spec up exactly what you
> need and post it to -www. Or even better, have one of your php guys
> write a patch ;-) But I can't imagine it shouldn't be insanely
> difficult, so probably someone else can do it for you.
>

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGtec8ATb/zqfZUUQRAtniAJ9oeXnxfzo2xPKS3NovZ8hcl1+ohgCgqecV
8nsSZ/Uwgmes8gwLEG4zh3g=
=y0ib
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----