Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki

From: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
Date: 2007-08-04 18:17:33
Message-ID: 46B4C2BD.7080100@pooteeweet.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Dave Page wrote:
>
>> ------- Original Message -------
>> From: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
>> To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
>> Sent: 04/08/07, 19:04:34
>> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
>>
>> Oh maybe I missed something here, but I did not realize that we are
>> discussing replacing the main site with a wiki. I just think that the
>> wiki is perfect when we want to involve a broad audience in the creation
>> of the text (which may very well then we moved to techdoc or the
>> documentation later on) or when its just for a quick one shot with a
>> life time if a few weeks (months tops).
>
> I fully support the use of a wiki for that (a good example is Greg Smith's recent pg/my comparison). I *do not* support the use of a wiki for final publication of anything aimed at end users.
>
> I also have no issue experimenting with permissions to help Josh and the advocacy guys, but I don't think another wiki is required.

+1

regards,
Lukas

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2007-08-04 18:17:59 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Previous Message Dave Page 2007-08-04 18:15:37 Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki