From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net |
Subject: | Re: compiler warnings on the buildfarm |
Date: | 2007-07-17 15:25:31 |
Message-ID: | 469CDF6B.6080209@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner napsal(a):
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>>> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>>>> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>>>>> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>>>>>> For sun studio -erroff=E_STATEMENT_NOT_REACHED is useful there. If you
>>>>>> want to determine warning tags for each warning add -errtags.
>>>>> Is that supported on all versions of sun studio(Sun WorkShop 6, Sun
>>>>> Studio 8,11) we have on the farm ?
>>>> Yes. Also on SS12.
>>> hmm - sure about that ? I was about to submit a patch to disable some
>>> compiler warnings but then I noted the following discussion thread:
>>>
>>> http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5163903&messageID=9637391
>>>
>>> which seems to indicate that at least the compiler installed on kudu:
>>>
>>> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=kudu&dt=2007-07-15%2003:30:01
>>>
>>>
>>> does NOT support turning of specific warnings.
>>>
>> I tested it on cc version 5.3 and it works. See
>
> ah cool - thanks for testing!
>
> so on my box we would need to add
> -erroff=E_EMPTY_TRANSLATION_UNIT,E_STATEMENT_NOT_REACHED,E_END_OF_LOOP_CODE_NOT_REACHED,E_FUNC_HAS_NO_RETURN_STMT,E_LOOP_NOT_ENTERED_AT_TOP
>
> to CFLAGS to get down to the following 2 warnings:
>
> "pgstat.c", line 652: warning: const object should have initializer:
> all_zeroes (E_CONST_OBJ_SHOULD_HAVE_INITIZR)
> "pgstat.c", line 2118: warning: const object should have initializer:
> all_zeroes (E_CONST_OBJ_SHOULD_HAVE_INITIZR)
>
> the open question is if that is what want or if we would be simply
> adding (unnecessary) complexity (or confusion).
>
> comments ?
E_STATEMENT_NOT_REACHED,E_END_OF_LOOP_CODE_NOT_REACHED, E_EMPTY_TRANSLATION_UNIT
are probably ok to ignore.
E_FUNC_HAS_NO_RETURN_STMT is there because main is leaved by exit() instead
return. And In another case It should be regular warning.
I think good solution is compare previous warning log with latest build and make
a diff. If some new warning appears it is probably regular warning.
Zdenek
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-07-17 15:25:52 | Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-17 15:18:49 | Re: Invalid to_date patterns (was: [PATCHES] [GENERAL] ISO week dates) |