| From: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 2PC-induced lockup |
| Date: | 2007-07-12 18:02:55 |
| Message-ID: | 46966CCF.4010202@gmx.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 18:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> There seems like a number of ways that unresolved prepared transactions
>>> can cause problems. We really need to have startup mention how many
>>> prepared transactions there are, so we have some chance of understanding
>>> and resolving potential problems.
>> While I have no particular objection to such a log entry, I doubt it
>> will fix anything; how many people will really think to look in the
>> postmaster log?
>
> Even if it were just you and me. From my perspective, thats enough.
At least, such a message seems much more useful than the list of
historic startup messages that were removed recently. Just my two €-cents.
Best Regards
Michael Paesold
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-07-12 18:11:33 | Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-12 16:31:36 | Re: compiler warnings on the buildfarm |