Re: script binaries renaming

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: script binaries renaming
Date: 2007-07-08 01:29:39
Message-ID: 46903E03.2030700@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2007, at 13:50 , Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>>> Dave Page wrote:
>>>> This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree with
>>>> Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them does
>>>> seem somewhat annoying. Worse yet, pg_* is just awkward to type.
>>
>>> But these utilities are mostly using in scripts -> one type, multi use.
>>
>> According to whom? The ones that are really at issue I think are
>> createuser/createlang/dropuser/droplang, and those seem mainly intended
>> for interactive use. In a script you might as well use psql -c.
>
> I'm curious as to know how often these are used at all. I think I may
> have used createuser once and used to use createlang, but I can't recall
> ever using the others.
>
> Michael Glaesemann
> grzm seespotcode net
>

I use createuser, createdb all the time, as well as createlang from time
to time. I never use the drop versions.

Regards, Dave

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-07-08 08:49:08 Re: Implementation of new operators inside the PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-08 00:42:25 Re: Fixed from TODO?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2007-07-08 03:25:33 Re: dblink connection security
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2007-07-07 23:18:43 Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...