Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Date: 2009-09-10 17:16:46
Message-ID: 4674.1252603006@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> alvherre=# select text_format('% was % at % and said % % times', 'Pavel'::text, 'here'::unknown, now(), row('a','b','c'), '{42}'::int[]);
> text_format
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pavel was here at 2009-09-10 13:12:09.054653-04 and said (a,b,c) {42} times
> (1 fila)

Is that what's being proposed? That pretty much sucks --- it's just
another way of concatenating some strings. I thought the idea was to
provide the same power as sprintf, eg field width controls, numeric
formatting options, etc.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2009-09-10 17:22:24 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-09-10 17:13:20 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types