Re: Not ready for 8.3

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Not ready for 8.3
Date: 2007-05-16 20:18:33
Message-ID: 464B6719.9080501@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Richard Huxton wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>>> It's been on my list to rewrite the whole archive system for a while
>>>>> for various reasons. There is quite a bit of crossover with the patch
>>>>> tracker I proposed so I was hoping to look at both together.
>>>> Let me know when you start on that...
>>> Roger.
>>
>> Same here - I've done something similar (off mhonarc files and in much
>> smaller scale) before, and I'm definitely interested in helping out.
>
> Is everyone aware of this system that runs on a well-known open-source
> database?
> http://www.archiveopteryx.org/
> I've used it in a small way, and while I don't claim to have looked at
> it in detail it seems to pretty much do what it claims to.
>

Yeah, I looked at it in the past. The database storage part is actually
pretty simple - it's the web front end that's going to take more effort,
and thats what that product doesn't do (or if it does, it's a secondary
function they don't shout about).

Regards, Dave.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2007-05-16 20:32:44 Re: Not ready for 8.3
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2007-05-16 19:58:07 Re: Not ready for 8.3