Re: Not ready for 8.3

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Not ready for 8.3
Date: 2007-05-16 18:24:31
Message-ID: 464B4C5F.70800@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ron Mayer wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> I think that may be where we're heading. In that case, we may need to
>>> talk about branching earlier so that developers can work on the new
>>> version who are frozen out of the in-process one.
>> I've argued this in the past. But be aware that it will make more work
>> for committers. It is very far from cost-free.
>
> I hate to bring up the CMS flamewar again, but IMHO the one advantage
> the distributed systems (Git, Monotone, Darcs, etc) have over CVS &
> subversion is that they push this branch management cost down to the
> developer who wants a branch - rather from the guys maintaining the
> official CMS.

One step at a time :). We are now married, and have just begun to have
have children. We need to buy a house in the next year, and figure out
how to pay off some debt without going into hock up to our ears with a
long term low interest loan.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-05-16 19:16:53 Re: Managing the community information stream
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2007-05-16 18:17:34 Re: Not ready for 8.3