Re: Not ready for 8.3

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <Robert(dot)Haas(at)dyntek(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Not ready for 8.3
Date: 2007-05-16 16:29:12
Message-ID: 464B3158.2040607@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> hate the fact that FTS is a separate module.
>
> Here here.
>
> And with respect to the debate about syntax, who cares? I think I
> prefer introducing real SQL-ish syntax over a bunch of pg_* functions,
> but doing it either way is IMHO better than doing nothing.
>

I care. I want a professional easy to understand and easy to maintain
that doesn't cause potential conflict with future and past development
syntax.

Or should we be writing SQL in assembly?

Joshua D. Drake

> ...Robert
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2007-05-16 17:02:35 Re: Not ready for 8.3
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-05-16 16:24:31 Re: 8.3 pending patch queue